5/27/2021 0 Comments Probate Disputes - Can Two Or More Professional Executors Really Trust to Administer the Estate?In the United States, there are two types of law that help to govern the relationships among joint executors - principles and statutes. Both provide for a certain amount of flexibility regarding who can make decisions for the other party. Unfortunately, sometimes one of the two takes control and decides to not follow the wishes of the other. This happens often in real estate transactions. In many cases, one of the two executors is expected to act in the name of the deceased testator. Under these circumstances, if one of the two executors disagrees with the wishes of the deceased, then he or she has to try to convince the jury that it is in the best interests of the beneficiary to appoint both. If the two do not get their way, then the court has the option to appoint one of the testators or order a new testator. In some states, however, joint ownerships and several ownerships are deeming to be an unusual situation, and therefore testators cannot change this arrangement. Check out this link: https://moneysavingsadvice.co.uk/contested-probate/joint-executors-disagree/, to get more enlightened on executors and their roles. The same can be said for disagreements between two or more professional executors. In some situations, one professional executor may believe that a client's wishes should be followed, while another does not. If either one of the professional executors is convinced that the client's will is unreasonable, then he or she can argue it with the other executor. If this doesn't result in a change in the court's decision, then the client retains the right to take his or her case to the jury. You may want to check out this site to learn more on how to solve solve probate disputes amicably. In some cases, two or more non-conformists might work together to set up a testament. However, when this happens, it becomes necessary to appoint one executor to act in the client's behalf and the other to perform the deed. This scenario is commonly referred to as a double-tied will. Many situations may arise where two or more professional or unprofessional joint executors don't agree on how to administer the estate. To avoid these types of disputes, clients can appoint a single person to serve as their "successor" in the probate process. Although they're considered only as "successor" and not as executor themselves, they still can exercise all of the powers and authority possessed by an executor. They'll just do so without any responsibilities or obligations to the client. Another way to avoid potential probate disputes is to work with a qualified and experienced probate lawyer and account representative to handle all of the estate's affairs. By working with one person who is both a qualified professional and an expert in estate law, the problems that arise in the course of dealing with two or more problematic joint executors can be addressed effectively and completely. This type of management is helpful for many situations, and also tends to be more affordable and convenient for most people. If you want to know more about this topic, then click here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispute_resolution.
0 Comments
Joint Executors cannot agree to work together. If they do, then it is probably best if both quit. If you are like most companies, it is important that your teams work together to get money savings advice and coordinate with each other. If the JE can't agree on what to work on, then its time for them to go. There is nothing worse than having unhappy team members on a project. It's not good for business or fun either. One of the biggest problems that you may encounter is when one of your JE doesn't like the direction you are taking for the company. For example, maybe they don't like the direction you have for the financials, but they love the marketing part. Well, if you want to fire this person, you will need to get rid of both jobs. And that may be a little bit difficult, because one of them may be worth more money than the other. It all depends on how much each individual is worth and how much the company is willing to pay them to split the workload. The JE may really dislike the financial situation, but at the same time, they can't stand the idea of not being able to offer their services because they love the other role. Another problem that you may run into when you have two competent but disagreeing Executors is the ability to communicate and negotiate properly. You may have one that comes in with a different idea of how things should be done and it is up to you to sort out the differences while trying to keep everyone on the same page. In some situations, they may not completely agree with the decisions you make and they may be able to offer suggestions that will help you reach your goals. If one of your JE doesn't agree with the ideas, then he or she will need to be replaced. Click on this tab and view here for more info on the best executors who will work cohesively with others. Now, even though there can be arguments between the JE and one of your Executors, there still needs to be some communication between the two. You need to let them know what is going on and remind them of the things you both want to accomplish for the job. Be prepared to give them their job and show them how much you are relying on them for the work to be done. Also, remind them of the importance of hiring only the best people for the job so that you don't end up having to deal with a lot of resentment on either side. If you have been having problems with the department and need to make changes, allow your JE to understand what is going on and make the necessary changes if needed. One of the worst possible scenarios is if one of the Executors becomes ill or dies. This may not necessarily happen, but if it does, then it will be up to the remaining Executors to select a new JE. The only way this will work is if there was a thorough discussion about this possibility well in advance of the illness or death. If this is not done, then there will be resentment and potential problems down the road. The last thing that you can do as an Estate Planningyer is to try and keep your job by yourself through the use of a proxy. Your Proxy will need to be approved by the Joint Commission and should be carefully chosen so that your needs are met. Proxy approvals should be handled very carefully, so that they do not conflict with the wishes of the deceased Executor. A proxy should be used only if one of the Executors is ill and cannot sign the document. If a proxy cannot be handled, then it is recommended that you immediately remove yourself from the situation. Find out more details in relation to this topic here: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/how-to-choose-the-right-e_b_3625961. 5/27/2021 0 Comments Who Is the Joint Executors? Joint Executors on this article are usually called upon to testify at a probate or estate court proceeding if one or more of the named individuals die. Many people believe that when one dies, there should be a simple distribution of property to the joint executors. While there may not be a formal written agreement between the two, often there is an understanding that a certain amount of property will go to the surviving spouse or children. There is no need for a probate lawyer, and it's not necessary to file any type of W-2 document, since the beneficiaries of the estate are usually referred to as the "successor beneficiary." However, it is always advisable to consult with a probate and estates attorney who can assist you and answer questions you might have. If the two named Executors are dead, then the court will determine who gets what assets. In many cases, the court may award to one or more of them, or it may award to one person. In the unusual case that no one is named on the petition, or if the deceased fails to have a valid power of attorney or living trust, then the court will decide who gets the property. This decision may be based on the age and condition of the individual, their financial circumstances, and the relationship of the two named individuals prior to death. Factors which may be considered in making the order of property distribution include: There are situations where the two named Executors may become irreconcilable. For example, if one spouse has a substantial pension and the other is not eligible for retirement benefits, the pension may become a major asset for the survivor. Although the surviving spouse may have an estate which would qualify for property taxes, the non-retirement spouse may choose to defer income tax until distribution. If the deceased was married, they are generally not required to make a joint-tenancy; however, some states do require that there be a joint tenancy. In this situation, assets must be divided fairly evenly, or the state may become involved. When there are a substantial number of assets owned by two or more people and one of them has a large asset base, the court here may appoint one of the Executors to act as the "trustee in trust of the assets," which means that the assets will be managed in the best interests of all beneficiaries. Depending on the state, this appointment may also mean that the estate will become a beneficiary of some type. While the beneficiaries can designate which asset(s) will be distributed, the court may also name alternate trustees to manage the assets in question. When there are many assets owned by one or more people and one or more of them has a very limited asset base, but several millions of dollars, the court may appoint one of the Executors to act as the trustee of the assets in question. In these cases, the two principals (the deceased and their survivors) may divide the assets among themselves as they see fit. The problem here is that there may be an inconsistent beneficiary. If so, it may become necessary to change the trust into a durable power of attorney so that the testator can make some decisions regarding the assets based on what they represent today. Joint proprietorships are not without their problems. If there are irreconcilable differences among the two principals(s), one or both may have a valid claim that they are entitled to a greater portion of the assets than they are entitled to now. But, if that happens, it is usually up to the courts to decide who gets what. If both executors disagree, then a court battle may be the only option. Follow this link for more info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executor. |
|